Alain, help !!

You didn't tell what went wrong and where !
Unless of course you mean that it (what upsampling ?) never plays right. And since I don't (and never did) expect *that*, I don't get it.

I don't understand this either; WASAPI ? Didn't we "agree" that you should test with KS ?

And then lastly, this was about finding out out where it was right and wrong again. You say nothing about that though. And it feels wrong to have my own conclusion about it ...

Probably I said something like that, but then in some context now lacking here, and *thus* I don't understand this either.

Still no dice.
A bit of a problem is that I have no means to test this sound wise. But I've looked in the program, and all what is done for 48000 is done for 44100 exactly the same (unless my searching capabilities are not the best). Meaning : if this happens with 48000 it should happen with 44100 just the same.
... which of course is not happening in your situation.

All I can think of is that 16/48000 hardly will be a normal audio format, and whatever it is you have there, it will be a non-common rip. This means that something could be wrong in the header, and that *this* is not covered for correctly by the software - somewhere.
On this matter, you could send me a track of this.

What also -theoretically- can be the case, is that somehow your DAC is not able to do this right. Now, however, my story really must be the other way around from above : playing 16/48 will be the most normal to a DAC (because this is video standard).

Now I think of it : I will be able to test it without sound, by measuring the track time. I mean, I do have a 24 bit device (HiFace) but no DAC for behind it. But I feel it is better if I first have an example track. Ok ?

Thanks,
Peter

Okay, it could be so that I don't understand anything much today !

??

Actually those tables. Envision over 100 meters (300ft) of length and certain width only to cover for the outside walls so to speak. Then it would have been in 3 layers, so that is actually 300 meters of length of table. And then there's still nothing counted for the middle of the space (which is 6 meters wide everywhere). In there had to be man holes at positions so all could be reached and all was to be of a construction I couldn't work out much.
But there was also the problem of designing the track for which I could not find proper software. So, had to scale the tables properly which already wasn't doable and together with that the proper scaling of bends, junctions and such. So I had to write software for *that* first, and that never happened.

But maybe the real problem was this :
When I was of the age of 11, we moved to a new house and in the old house my father built that table of the size of the room which could go to the sealing when not in use. I always helped my father with everything and learned a few things there;
All was to fit in a room in the new house, but it didn't. This is how I started to lay out the already fairly much lot just on the floor and with the 5 locs we had I made it all 100% automated. With relais and my own made contact rails and such and 100s of meters of electrical wire. Just on the floor. Once or twice a year I layed it out and made drew a new track design which would bring the most unpredictable behaviour of it all. So, 11 and up;
When 14 years ago our son was born, it was clear he would be joining me in the same fashion, later. So at his first birthday we gave him this nice steam locomotive. That would help.
But today he still doesn't know what to do with a soldering iron and is only capable of positioning his computer mouse a 100 times faster than I can. Plays Railroad Tycoon and the lot (btw the only game I ever played in my whole life). Modern times ? perhaps. But I already said it : once the simulation (or projection) by computer(s) would be there, it would already have been a great thing to play with. That is what *I* saw coming, only getting tired of the physical stuff to come.
So I saw that (not) coming with our son, and no way I would perform such a project for myself. Well, not anymore. Man, I already run hot when I have to plug in the analyser. Haha.

So it's a combination of a few things, but it was too large scaled anyway. Was due to be world's largest and most complex, but merely interesting to watch forever (which all tracks I know are not at all).

Oh, the "operating system" would have been the ERP software from my other life; it can nicely deal with demands and fulfillment which can be used to direct trains from A to B, but merely this ERP system already consists of tracking and directives (where to go to) by means of GPS data ...

It seems to me that only the frog is able to stop this topic and, to tell the truth, she is  totally freaked looking at the train tracks without daring to cross them. I think she likes more music than trains...

After all, here : XXHighEnd Model 0.9z-7-4 (alows for more PA situations + new SQ setting). But notice the heading under which it is listen "Prior to ...".

Peter

Alain please stop this topic! Far too risky! What would happen if you get Peter started again on this train-project ?

Leo

Alain,

That depends on the "window". So, what do you mean - which program etc. ?

Peter

You mean opposed to "hires" ?
I don't know. But it really (really) won't matter anyway. Or actually I think it's the other way around; I play (ripped) CDs exclusively (already because it is to be about that IMO).

And then STILL it will be better again. Currently I am the only one who is able to listen to it. And so I dedicate my SQ to be the best in the world at this moment.
But that won't take long ...