Ramesh, this is a bit of a combination of things. Long story short, if you upsample 8x instead of 16x it will be fine.

Regards,
Peter

Juan, I said 8.8 but I think I meant to say 8.0. I can't even check it any more because I was testing with the odd numbers and it got overritten with a lot of 9's. LOL
I shall try both tonight, if I don't forget.

Regards and thanks,
Peter

This is/was so on purpose. It is related to memory allocation. But, I wonder whether this is still a problem (over here all keeps working). So the next version allows the odd numbers.

Regards,
Peter

SFS = 8.8 and 705.6 / Low Filter sounded superb here.
An if anything, more bass again.

Thank you Juan.
I will try the Low filter tonight.

Regards,
Peter

Now that.
Does anyone know how many freakin' combinations this program has ?

Hi Juan,

Looks all fine to me.

Best regards,
Peter

Richard, you are completely correct. It does not stick after Unattended Playback ...

Peter

Do you guys actually TYPE the number ? So, backspace to erase all in the field, type 9, tab, done.
I have 9.00 in there right now. No problem at all.

It is not that your Max SFS limits it somehow ?
Btw, you say Enter - I go out with Tab. Maybe there is a difference in that ?

Hi Richard,

I am not aware of this. Still not, because over here this is just possible (like 11.70).

?

Regards,
Peter

Haha LOL ... I had to think a bit, but indeed, your XXOSK1.exe will be killed now because it is not an internally protected program(-name) to (let) stay.
Do this :

In the Services section in Settings, there's these two large fields. In the field named "Keep Processes" enter this :

{XXOSK1}
(or whatever name you gave to it)

And now it will stay.

Thank you and especially your wife for the kind words. And worship the power of your wife. She can be crucial in the process anyway but also has better ears than we male. Or at least they won't be biased to self-bought speakers and such.



Best regards,
Peter

I don't know whether it was my Tuesday Evening Ears or something else, but yesterday at the SFS of 10 I had the idea that the whole "thing" changed. All as fresh as could be (no distortion) but/and in a sense that all seemed way louder too. Even at still playing at ~4.5dB softer levels because the beginning of the evening, I received the question "isn't that loud" ? And in advance of that I thought the same already.

So SFS=12 is too dull. SFS=8 was fine and good to stay. But SFS=10 jumps out regarding everything ? It is only that I don't trust the "loudness". That could - or even should indicate "distortion".
What do you guys think of this ?

And who is first in going to use the first digit ? (like 10.4) 

Peter

Richard - I have it there too.
The other day (3-4 months back ?) a few of us experiemented with the front side, but IIRC that was rejected by all. I think mine was in there for 45 seconds or so.

Regards,
Peter

Hey George !
OMG, so I *am* getting old. So yes, I think the "not a" thing is getting to my head.

#13, are you serious ??? LOL

Very nice of you to jump in !

Kind regards,
Peter