182
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Help addressing " special mode " problem
|
on: March 18, 2012, 08:07:44 pm
|
Thanks to you Peter Recently , I changed the RAM bank in this old Laptop of mine . For long had the suspect that the little system suffered some "bottle neck" effect from some side . So that , changed the 2 gig to a more comfortable frequency ( higher than the previous ) and it started to manage well some obvious things , like the better audio and video . The " non up to speed " systems mentioned in your reply above , reminded me to try again the " power settings " which are in the laptop ( every laptop? ) and under W7 , by pushing the battery icon . And what I found? ... that the cpu was working at almost 40% of its possible speed . I never pushed to full speed before , simply because the old ram bank - by my point of view - was not "interacting" well for the system . Now , with the CPU at 100% XXHigh End to an SFS of 80 , has been able in Unattended mode to let me listen almost the complete album with only one interruption . It's not perfect yet , but the sound is starting finally to go out through the speakers , more depth and bass and detail , and ... in Special Mode . Well a good achievement for today , and let say the problem is "solved" for now . Nice learning experience , and looking forward for a new PC anyway . Stefano
|
|
|
183
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Help addressing " special mode " problem
|
on: March 18, 2012, 05:48:38 pm
|
Hi Peter , I am back after a test :
Dac needs are 32 bit , and I confirm that the playlist area is composed with just one album of the same format . Then let's try .
Buffer Size =1024 Q1=14 PP=low TP=normal Sfs=150 , SC
I am able to tell you that sometimes it goes wrong also in the middle of a track . @Unattended the same problem happens , and even during the playing of the single track , then I have to stop by the means of hot key . Sometimes the system plays the full track completely well ( it depends probably on the memory settings imo )
Looks to me like the system is close to its limits , since it tends to "loose synchronization" also when I -touch the player- ( it does means when I scroll the playlist menu or the settings menu during the playback ) .
In Adaptive mode , everything works perfectly also with very long playlists .
Thanks again
Stefano
I may add one thing : it *sometimes* happens that when Unattended is not pushed , and soon after the request for "play" the player gui disappears from the screen , and can't be recovered . It will be still in the processes , then the music starts . After some minutes , but not always , the gui returns as if it was minimized on the bar .
|
|
|
184
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Help addressing " special mode " problem
|
on: March 18, 2012, 05:20:51 pm
|
Hi Peter , I am back after a test :
Dac needs are 32 bit , and I confirm that the playlist area is composed with just one album of the same format . Then let's try .
Buffer Size =1024 Q1=14 PP=low TP=normal Sfs=150 , SC
I am able to tell you that sometimes it goes wrong also in the middle of a track . @Unattended the same problem happens , and even during the playing of the single track , then I have to stop by the means of hot key . Sometimes the system plays the full track completely well ( it depends probably on the memory settings imo )
Looks to me like the system is close to its limits , since it tends to "loose synchronization" also when I -touch the player- ( it does means when I scroll the playlist menu or the settings menu during the playback ) .
In Adaptive mode , everything works perfectly also with very long playlists .
Thanks again
Stefano
|
|
|
185
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Help addressing " special mode " problem
|
on: March 18, 2012, 11:59:47 am
|
Hello Peter and All ,
From my current and limited system ,
all works fine itself , except when I try to listen to the special mode . At a given buffer size , say 1024 , scheme 4 , sfs 150 mixed contiguous or straight contiguous ,well I just could listen one song at a time correctly .
When XX goes to the next track in the play list , distorsion occurs as very low pitch and rumors . If I play stop and play again the "new" song it can be reproduced well .
This just in special mode .
What could I do to address the problem ?
Thanks
Stefano
|
|
|
186
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Get ready ? (0.9z-7)
|
on: February 25, 2012, 06:31:28 pm
|
Hello Peter and All , I have a question for the next version . since the last one is working so well now in my pc ; Will I have before install to turn the system back to the original state from the minimized os ? I guess the instructions will explain me all , but I am getting curious for the new changes
|
|
|
187
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / Re: Hey laptop users......
|
on: January 31, 2012, 01:25:12 pm
|
While Battery power probably offers more " isolation " ,it doesn't *necessarily* work for better noise and sound specs .There are few examples of experiments where it is demonstrated that Batteries can be more noisy than Power Supplies .
That said , in my laptop I changed a little bit the grounding scheme , for good reasons .
|
|
|
188
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / Re: XXhighend digital filters question
|
on: January 27, 2012, 05:00:26 pm
|
In addition, the output really is 32 bits for DACs denoted as "DAC Needs" = 32 bits (see Setting). In this case truncation to 24 bits happen when the "DAC Is" (see Setting) is 24. All nothing much different from how it happens in-DAC where most often the interface is 32 bits, but the DAC can process 24 only. Notice that with the HiFace (Evo ?) you can set the DAC Needs at either 24 or 32. 24 should sound better (don't ask). Be careful at trying it (analogue volume low). Peter I guess in my case , the interface would process 32 bit data , then the dac "only" 24 . No idea really , if there is truncation or not or ... editing post , yes ...there is . Anyway I will set 24 bit needs and listen . sb
|
|
|
191
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Recording Progress
|
on: December 10, 2011, 09:24:36 pm
|
Nice reading Peter ,
I think we should be documented in consoles and their inside circuits to have an idea of what was happening after all the manipulation ( and this is the thinking of the analog era ) . Me-today I tend to listen with relatively low gain amps , most of the time no-negative feedback and as a result surely not op-amps . I am not talking about chip amps which I decided to not put in my listening experience todays ( diy guy here ) . Many of the market-level amps are after all op-amps themselves around their circuitry , and there is still confusion about polarity of the signal , which seems to be a problem for some designers to respect or advise of .So it's not so difficult to back-imagine what are the results of op-amps manipulation just when listening with a non-operational amplifier , but this doesn't happen everyday . I remember once I had to work with an all op-amp mixing console and recording ( analog ) , and it was absolutely impossible to obtain a good result out of it . The excessive gain of the stages with further use of negative feedback rendered the sound unusable . In the Non oversampling design ( back to digital ) but also in the oversampling zone , using output stages with no feedback is very interesting also , especially cascoding the Current-output DAC . I must say today I would be very curious to try that together with XXHigh-End player and listen .
|
|
|
193
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: XXHighendModel 0.9z-6
|
on: September 12, 2011, 04:32:42 pm
|
Hi Peter,
the SQ with this version is really amazing.
Yes indeed !!! Received this message though : "interrupt mechanism out of order ; notify XXHiHend development ( restart playback ) . Then I stop playback and press "ok" on the message . I am playing minimize os now , but left on the wasapi services . stefano
|
|
|
194
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: XXHighendModel 0.9z-6
|
on: September 12, 2011, 01:47:50 pm
|
Nah, this is not clear to me. Maybe because it is not clear to you. The Off button just removes XXEngine3.exe from memory. This frees that memory. When you next lower the SFS and initiate Playback, that new amount of memory will be reserved. It should (again) stay as long as no Off is used. BUT, it needs that Playback to get XXEngine3.exe running in the first place (hence allocate the memory). Once you get the message about lowering the SFS, XXEngine3.exe will be out of memory after that. But, use Off to be sure. And no, there is no indication at this moment whether XXEngine3 is in there or not. Maybe now you can rephrase your question ? (if still necessary of course) Peter Jaja , it's ok now !
|
|
|
195
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: XXHighendModel 0.9z-6
|
on: September 12, 2011, 01:32:19 pm
|
and of course the "lower SFS message Do you get this while you have played before for the (boot) session and never used the Off button ? In that situation you should not get those messages, although I think I saw it one time myself. ? Good question , not sure if I respond correctly but probably not , I didn't received the messages in that situation . Now I understand better the function of the new Off button ; anyway is it possible that after Off function activated , the playback just doesn't start anymore , but *it will* after lowering the SFS without rebootin ? Just guessing Stefano Edit , Have try the off button , and start again the playback and it plays , SFS 70 MC , SFS 70 SC and also SFS 90 SC . So that seems good ... .
|
|
|
|