XXHighEnd

Ultimate Audio Playback => XXHighEnd Support => Topic started by: christoffe on March 05, 2013, 12:08:19 pm



Title: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: christoffe on March 05, 2013, 12:08:19 pm
Hi Peter,

on my system, with nearly the same settings as before, the music files are not loaded into the memory anymore.

Any idea?

Joachim

P.S. Same in "Unattended"


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: PeterSt on March 05, 2013, 01:30:42 pm
This is the SFS Joachim. The smaller the less is loaded into memory.

And might you say "yes but before my SFS was also that small" then you tricked yourself by setting SFS Max at a high value, which only reserves the memory by that amount and of which you will have though it was consuming it. But the SFS itself is cauding that.

Does that help ?
Peter


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: christoffe on March 05, 2013, 03:48:18 pm
Hi Peter,

as written before, SFS changed to 220.

The CPU activity increases now to 100% at two times per minute.
The max. CPU load was appr. 8% with a lower SFS value (2) before.

Joachim


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: PeterSt on March 05, 2013, 04:22:40 pm
So, OK.


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: christoffe on March 05, 2013, 05:41:26 pm
So, OK.

Hi Peter,

you see that I'm using Wave files, and my understanding was that nearly no activity of the CPU is necessary during replay.
On previous releases I did not notice this 100% peaks.

Joachim


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: PeterSt on March 05, 2013, 05:54:10 pm
Oh yes, those peaks are always there. And the higher the SFS the further they are apart and the more "100%" they will be. This is why the SFS of 2 shows a virtual constant "low load".

Regards,
Peter


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: AlainGr on March 05, 2013, 06:22:18 pm
Oh yes, those peaks are always there. And the higher the SFS the further they are apart and the more "100%" they will be. This is why the SFS of 2 shows a virtual constant "low load".

Regards,
Peter
So this explains why I was recently seeing some peaks that I did not understand... I forgot to transpose the 192khz max upsampling with the 768khz. Of course, with 768khz, the peaks arrives 4 times faster...

Alain


Title: Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management
Post by: PeterSt on March 05, 2013, 10:08:30 pm
Yup.