XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
April 25, 2024, 05:43:09 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
121  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Anyone needing support ? go to X-Fi on: October 08, 2012, 10:47:44 am
Hi Peter!

The new loudspeaker from Bert looks interesting. What is the total width and height of the basshorn (wings)?

Best regards
Petter
122  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Don't be shocked ... on: August 20, 2012, 04:26:20 pm
This forum is the ancient SMF version 1.1, a freeware downloadable here: http://www.simplemachines.org/

The 1.1 version is several years old. The current version is 2.0.2.
According to the SMF forum upgrade/conversion from 1.1 to 2.0.2 is easy.
I recommend Peter to do this upgrade. I have good experience with the SMF 2.0 from other forum.

Also, SMF v2.0 makes it easier to put photos within the text in a post. If so, I guess more members would post photos and album covers.

----------

Any thing else? Oh, yes; This new color scheme is ugly as hell. Also, it is more difficult to read a text in light color on dark background. Dark ink on light background is better to the eye. Source&Hints here: http://uxmovement.com/content/when-to-use-white-text-on-a-dark-background/


----------

But heeeeey! - who am I to complain? As long as the sound is this good and Peter is such a nice gentleman, he could write the forum in Chinese and I would not complain about it! (Eventually he must come to Norway once in a while and explain to me what I have missed from the forum).  Grin
123  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-705 vs 0.9z-61c on: July 29, 2012, 10:50:05 am
Great news, Flecko!

What about the treble? -And the presentation (placement) of the cymbals in the mix?
124  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Wanted : 20 Beta Testers on: July 27, 2012, 09:56:57 am
sh*t. One of my power amps are down, so I cant even apply for duty. Thanks to all the voulenteers who is doing an effort here.

Looking forward to read your feedback!
125  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Don't be shocked ... on: July 17, 2012, 11:53:07 am
The forum is stone age. Can't even mix photos inbetween the text.

An update is welcome.
126  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: PC electrical isolation from DAC on: June 24, 2012, 02:23:55 pm
Thanks for letting us in on this discovery.  Good job !

My dedicated music PC creates a little bit of fan noise, it is bulky (ugly) and the 600w power supply outputs heat. Getting it out of the living room is high on my list. But that means, as you addresses, the need of efficient galvanic isolation in order to avoid ground loops when running the PC on another voltage line.

Unfortunately I am not that clever with PC electronics, so I'll have wait and learn from your experience first. I don’t mind being spoon-fed about the process here!   thankyou
127  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Get ready ? (0.9z-7) on: June 17, 2012, 01:40:32 am
I agree 100 percent with Mani's suggestion!

(I allways thought there was a decimal missing in the price tag of XX).

Pedal
128  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: HiRez & XXHighEnd on: June 11, 2012, 02:06:05 pm
Quote
(But XX can't make up for the difference in SQ between 16 and 24 bits, though).

Hi pedal,

Totally unrelated to that I am the developer of XXHighEnd, but merely and foremost from a general perspective (of which you know I may have written hundreds of posts on the subject, although not in here) :

Can you qualify this by any means you can think of ?
And please, "listening" is not the answer, because I listen too, and I don't agree. So, what's left is theories and technical matters and outlays.

OK. Right now I am full of work, but I will revert in a couple of days with theoretical explaination and music examples!
129  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / HiRez & XXHighEnd on: June 11, 2012, 01:08:46 pm
I think I should rather stated that "Hires does not necessarily give a better sound quality". This is what Robert Harley explained in his article.
Yes, there are many "fake" hi-rez titles out there. And some titles sounds poor even from the mastertapes, so the hi-rez transfer is useless anyway. (Garbage in/garbage out).

Quote
But with AP XXHE, I have to pay attention to hear the difference.
I agree. Especially in the treble. (But XX can't make up for the difference in SQ between 16 and 24 bits, though).
130  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / HiRez & XXHighEnd on: June 11, 2012, 10:53:18 am
[Moderator action : This was split from Praise for xxHighEnd because of relevancy not on-topic in there (or anyway this here is a discussion within itself)]


Hires does not yield better sound quality at all.

I disagree. "Hi-rez" is more than treble performance. It is certainly true that the XX/NOS1 consept of ARC Prediction and filterless DAC elevates digital playback to new heights including the most natural and "real" treble I have ever heard.

However, "hi-rez" is also the difference between 16 and 24 bit. The latter providing a more smooth, fluid and "ripe" sound, especially in the bass. There is more low level information and acoustical presence with good hi-rez recordings. Redbook 16/44 has a kind of intrinsic "dryness", which I didnt notice before discovering (good) hi-rez material.

Fortunately, with XX/NOS1 I can have the best of both worlds. Nowadays I almost exclusively listen to hi-rez. There is no going back. Once you pop it, you can't stop it!
131  Ultimate Audio Playback / Music Storage and convenient playback / Re: Due Remote features : URGENT QUESTION to all ! on: May 30, 2012, 01:17:11 am

... So, controlling XXHighEnd with any tablet (iPad, Android based, more ?) ...The subject are two Bluetooth dongles...

A question for better understanding of use:
Where do you plug these 2 dongles? Are they of USB format and both of them to be plugged into to music PC?
-So we get wireless Bluetooth interface with a tablet/smartphone/laptop (with bluetooth capabilities, of course)?

If so, I guess the music PC has to be in same room as the tablet, then (distance limited to the capability of the Bluetooth format of course)?
132  Ultimate Audio Playback / Music Storage and convenient playback / Re: Due Remote features : URGENT QUESTION to all ! on: May 28, 2012, 04:45:10 pm
One pair for me too!
133  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Enjoy The Music article on Hires worth a look on: May 01, 2012, 03:40:03 pm
For the record:

Digital recording of 2012 has become "perfect".
Music producers and recording engineers are no longer able to discern between the live feed they hear in the control room and the digital recording of it.

Morten Lindberg of 2L (state of the art recordings of live classical music utilizing the very best microphones and recording equipment available) says he reaches this level of perfection when recording at 24/352.8kHz (DXD).
Source: http://morten.lindberg.no/category/Audio+Engineering/

Bill Schnee, when recording jazz/rock in his studio, says it happens at 24/192 PCM, using a custom build DAC.
Source: http://bravurarecords.com/n_hist.html

Buying a Blu-ray disc or a hi-rez download of such a recording gives you the live feed. You hear what they heard in the monitoring room. If your playback system is better than theirs (doesn’t take much) you will hear the music with higher fidelity than the musicians did. This is the blessing of digital.

-------

Digital recording has become so transparent that it can be considered “perfect”. Digital mixing and postproduction is near perfect, although some engineers say mixing software like ProTool has a signature of its own. My guess is that this is anyhow less harming than good old (bad) analog mixing hardware.

Important note: Some artists (rock and pop genre) prefer recording to analog. But that is because they want the “color” of magnetic tape recording (tape saturation distortion). For such artists the desired “sound” is more important than absolute transparency. -Often they choose mixing and post production in digital domain. Example: Steely Dan, Everything Must Go.
Source: http://mixonline.com/recording/interviews/audio_steely_dan_everything/

Recording trivia: In the 60s when the Rolling Stones recorded in the States, they drove directly from the studio to the local radio station and gave the DJ a copy of their latest recording session. Then they sat out in the car, in the middle of the night, stoned on drugs and booze, listening through AM mono, and deciding if the mix was ok or not, before returning to the studio.

Keith Richards’s attitude towards sound quality hasn’t changed much. In his home studio of today he prefers directing the microphones away from the instruments.
Source: "Life", his resent autobiography.


-You might ask yourself why bother to buy the old Stones albums in hi-rez? Well, there are several valid reasons for that, but that’s food for another thread than this one.
134  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Enjoy The Music article on Hires worth a look on: May 01, 2012, 03:37:29 pm
This article starts out nice but gets off track at the end.
Agree.

The article includes several interesting technical points. But he is cherry picking. And why does he post this biased article?

My guess is than Ryan Mintz, the owner of Core Audio Technology (manufacturer of DACs and digital preamps), is about to launch new products with 1-bit converters.
135  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Problem reading tracks with different sample rates on: April 29, 2012, 04:53:27 pm
Fairly soon now. Happy

Remember you promissed us more prominent cymbals!  thankyou
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.112 seconds with 12 queries.