Peter, I suppose that at 32/768, the distorsion figures are lesser ?
Alain, yes. But other "accuracy" measures may be less/different and we can not measure them. Say like USB cables.
Still, what we can measure should be prevalent. So I would always hunt for the 32/768 (24/768) to sound the best over the lower rate. If that doesn't happen, something else should be out of order. Understand ? (and for sure no need to agree !).
When I say "a little", it really means
Now please continue ...
Peter
Hi Peter,
Don't tell me you suffer from insomnia yourself too ?
That phrase that I did not finish... Was started for what I already wrote, but I restarted and I forgot to check what is left... Misleading eh...
I do agree by the way. It sure makes sense, but it can be hard to identify what is going on...
There are details I can hear that surprises me, but now I have to admit that I need to be more focused instead of being lazy. I would like to put more precise words to reflect my impressions, but still I know that you are the "leader" (in the positive sense) and I try to apply it in my learning curve.
There are songs I use for very specific sounds or instruments. I like percussions, so I have a song with percussions that I really like. I use that when I wish to hear some realism.
Sometimes I will listen to another instrument that I can't even identify, but it will be either more or less prominent. My "beacons" are more or less loose but help me in my steps towards better SQ. I am still impressed with all that XXHE can allow. I can have headaches too !
Kind regards,
Alain
PS: Melatonin + valerian to help sleeping