XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
April 20, 2024, 03:51:51 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
31  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: new feature request:) on: April 16, 2008, 11:41:51 pm
Thanks Peter.
Although I don't understand why will it still influence?

Isn't it the same as 2. and then start XX again? Does it influence in this case?
32  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / new feature request:) on: April 15, 2008, 06:50:43 am
Hi Peter,

currently there are
1 Attended mode when you press play, XX engine 3 is started, XX gui stays up and shows the progress of playing
2 Unattended mode when you press play, XX engine is started, XX gui shuts down.

It would be nice to have:
3 Mode when you press play, XX engine 3 is started, XX gui stays up, but it won't show any progress or not be connected to the engine 3 at all.

it's like mode 2 but XX gui stays up.

Thanks
Andrey
33  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: u10 vs. u8 on: April 02, 2008, 07:16:01 am
About XMplay with wasapi:

IMHO it doesn't have stability of the sound. It does not feel solid as opposed to XX.
I would say the sound more liquid, not stable.
34  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: u10 vs. u8 on: April 02, 2008, 07:06:57 am
I tried:

1. u-8 mem unchecked
2. u-8 mem checked
3. u-10 mem unchecked
4. u-10 mem checked

1 sounds the best of all.

In 4 checking mem box cures the situation of 3 "twisting my head", but still not as good as 1 or 2.
2 sounds less smother than 1.

As I understand In my case checking mem box shouldn't change SQ because I am listening 16/44 But it does somehow.

Andrey
35  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: u10 vs. u8 on: April 02, 2008, 12:51:52 am
Yeah... it's good to be perfect...
36  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: u10 vs. u8 on: April 01, 2008, 10:42:20 pm
Andrey, can you tell at which settings you do this comparison ?
Priorities are both set to nothing, Q1=14, no invert, no upsample, 16/44.1, Unattended, Membox unchecked.

And can you describe for a simple soul like me i.e. in for me audible terms what you hear (as differences) ?
It may sounds whatever. But I can't describe it in soundstage terms. The bass and trebles seem the same. it's other thing.
It's just that physical discomfort I start to feel. It's like the left side of my head starts to shift related to the right. there... hahaha. Not sure if it helps.
And yes it is less musical and less enjoyable as an outcome.


I assume you compare Unattended only ?

yes

Lastly, wouldn't it be better for you to play with the Mem box checked ? (but first look whether it makes a difference at all, which you can see by the memory useage).

Will try it when get back "home" tonight.

Andrey
37  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: u10 vs. u8 on: April 01, 2008, 07:25:03 am
To me u8 sounds better/smother.
u10 gives me a "headache" of mine again.
But I seem to be alone in what I hear/feel. So don't think it is important anymore to others.
38  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Mem box doesn't work for 24/96 ? on: March 27, 2008, 06:00:19 pm
The only test I did was I joined the files back in again by some freeware joiner and the size of the joined file was the same as the original wav.
I didn't care to compare its contents though. I believe the cue splitter does not mess with the data it just splits them.

Sorry for hijacking and offtopic.
39  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Mem box doesn't work for 24/96 ? on: March 27, 2008, 12:00:22 am
Hi Dave,

Edit: in case you decide to try multiple files instead of single.

there's this freeware tool
http://www.medieval.it/content/view/28/70/

It has batch processing too. I use it time after time. With 2 or 3 hiccups on couple of files out of 200.

Andrey
40  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: mp3(wav) player wanted on: March 21, 2008, 04:16:56 am
Hi Russ,

I've been listening to d2 for a day already. and must say it sounds really great!!!
I really like it.

Thanks
Andrey
41  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: mp3(wav) player wanted on: March 20, 2008, 12:22:06 am
Thanks Russ,

The player is on its way. Cowon D2.

Next question:)

What ear plugs/buds do you think are best?
I myself was quite content with shure 210.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
Andrey
42  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Vista SP1 available on: March 19, 2008, 03:46:13 am
Installed SP1 too.
No surprises No SQ changes (I haven't noticed any)
43  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Interesting Q1 & .9U-2 on: March 18, 2008, 03:46:49 pm
I don't understand. what should I try?
44  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Interesting Q1 & .9U-2 on: March 18, 2008, 06:39:36 am
To follow up.

Did anyone tried unchecking this checkbox "playback devices => you device properies => advanced tab => Give exclusive mode applications priority"
For me there was a noticeable difference when I unchecked it.

It made u-6 listenable for me again. The last version I could bear was u-3 with Attended.

I wonder if it would change the SQ for someone else.

Andrey
45  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / mp3(wav) player wanted on: March 14, 2008, 10:31:18 pm
Hi All,

Not sure if it is alright to ask this here.
But my mp3 player (wav player) was stolen unhappy. And would like to ask your opinions about the best/cheapest portable wav player.
I had toshiba gigabeat U 2 GB previously. Thinking about smth better.

Thanks
Andrey
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.13 seconds with 12 queries.