XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
April 28, 2024, 11:27:12 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49
646  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: My SSD install on: December 09, 2008, 09:35:16 pm
Unexpected little "stalls" seem to have gone, but "minute long" stalls got in place of that.
Besides that, things seem to become more and more slow, and while converting a FLAC album can go in 10-15 seconds, this now merely takes 3-4 minutes. ...

Peter, get an intel SSD.
647  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / TC Konnekt 8 on: December 09, 2008, 09:33:44 pm
Anybody heard it?

If just for firewire pass-through is the first unit with an affordable (300€) pricetag and full 24/192k.
648  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / Re: DEQX users ... on: December 09, 2008, 09:32:48 pm
Agreed.

I think in the future the way to go is to use the computer for EQ purposes Happy
And the good part is that there are free programs that do that.
649  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: World's first NOS 24/192 filterless DAC ? on: December 04, 2008, 01:03:22 am
Personally I would like my future "ultimate" DAC to feature a BNC clock input.
I belive an external clock with huge PSU can be good. I am not an engineer, so I wonder if this option is easy to implement in your new DAC prototype?

An external clock shouldnt be needed. If done well (really well) the DAC has to be the master clock.

Quote
Another thing is that most DAC's are working from x48kHz samplingfrequency. (48, 96, 192, etc). But the CD is 44,1kHz. So inside the DAC, there has to be a samplerate convertion (SRC) chip in front of or integrated inside the DAC chip.

A NOS design like this (Peter correct me if I'm wrong) does not change the sampling rate, whichever you put in, that will be out. It is filterless. The beauty of peter creation is that it can accept 48, 88.2, 96,176,4 and up to 192k. Just to cite all available sampling rates Happy

Quote
I believe this SRC converters are "not good".

No, they are cr*p, they ruin the signal and add jitter, to avoid like all digital filters.

650  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: My SSD install on: November 13, 2008, 06:44:28 pm
Hey, thanks for the info Telstar.
Can you point me to a thread about this ? I want to understand what's actually wrong, or maybe contribute to that thread. Depending on how the situation is, get my money back maybe. nea

In the very end I want to taste the benefits, where one of them is speed (it really matters).

Read all this article:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403&p=7

There is some discussion on various hw forums, my favourite is xtreme systems. No thread that i know talks about audio performance.
But the latency issue IS an issue, due to intel ich and the jmicron controller of the majority of MLC SSD drives.
I dont think you can get a refund, but I hope u try soon a different SSD drive and post an update.
651  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: My SSD install on: November 13, 2008, 03:42:27 pm
I have an OCZ 64GB (and btw, I don't think SSDs exist in SATAII, only SATAI).

My chipset is the ICH8, but I must be careful, because there's also a JMicron part in there, and the lot can be controlled by 3 "drivers". Since I'm not using RAID this is beyond the user (me anyway) what you're actually using.

IIRC the IDE port is NOT part of intel ICH from ich7.

BTW there ARE serious problems with MLC SSD units (all but Intel) with intel controllers, so serious that you may have 1-3s pauses of everything, including music. You dont have such because you minimized services and cpu/disk usage.
So, you have a problem. The solution is not cheap, either way. Get a MLC disk, get an Intel MLC disk, or get an Areca sata raid card.

SeVeRed, do you have the same type of SSD?
I do THINK to agree with Gordon that SSD SHOULD be better for a music pc...

Besides, Windows7 will improve SSD speed and functionalities and may be good for sound too. A Beta2 or perhaps RC0 will be worth to try.
652  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: VISTA 32bit or 64bit ? on: November 06, 2008, 07:48:10 pm
Hi!

I have ordered i new Dell PC with a "Intel Core 2 Duo E8400" processor, dedicated for PC-Audio. I have ordered it with Vista Ultimate and the 32bit Vista version is installated when i get it. But i think a DVD with the 64bit Vista will come with the pack.

Should i get Dell to installate the 64bit version ?  Is 64bit better to the soundquality with XXHighEnd ?

Thanks, Tore


I dont think so. On the contrary you may have drivers issue with 64 bit.
So, unless you need >3gb of memory for video apps, go with 32 bit.
653  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your questions about the PC -> DAC route / Re: Firewire connection on: April 10, 2008, 03:03:27 pm
Hi Bernard,

Take a PCI card (and not even the cheapest one). It does matter (much) for me, and I encountered the same with others.
Anyway for the 10 euro such a card costs, you can always try !

Peter

A good firewire card with Ti chipset costs 50-60 euros. The cheap one probably wont change much vs the motherboard controller.
654  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: New soundcard on: March 30, 2008, 06:46:05 pm
Hia all,

Thank you very much for all your answers....... I am going to try a few things out before buying a new one.... And maybe i will keep it with the EMU i have had.... But than not an PCI and i will look for an external EMU....

Thanx again.... Happy Happy

Get the ESI firewire, its cheap. 96khz is the only limit, but if thats fine for you, that gets my vote.
655  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Vista SP1 available on: March 30, 2008, 06:45:03 pm
I recommend you upgrade to sp1 whenever possible as this patch, really makes vista faster and they have fix alot of stuff. copying files from network shares is definitely improved. network seems smoother.. overall, Vista is smoother now.. This is what vista should of have been since the beginning...

Besides the network fix (which was longtime due!) I didnt notice any improvement on my two systems. The lower-end was updated 3 weeks ago when the sp1 was not on windowsupdate yet. The higher end machine today, but it's 64 bit so no xx for it.
656  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Can't play with Terratec phase 24FW on: February 25, 2008, 11:05:42 pm
Quote from:  Telstar
I shut down xxhe and this time without doing anything i hit play, and it started playing without errors. I hit stop and poof, BSOD irql_not_less_than_equal

Today I coincidentally ran into a post mentioning this error as caused by the (W?)LAN driver.

Also, if you have Bluetooth on board (and you don't use it), try to uninstall the drivers for it.

That BSOD can be caused by almost anything. But because my machine is rock solid, the only cause is the audio. Either terratec driver, or the handing of the pci use by the mainboard or something in the latest version of xxhe.
657  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Can't play with Terratec phase 24FW on: February 23, 2008, 11:11:57 pm
The SP1 did not fix the BSOD.

BTW, the program hangs up (not responding) when i click on the library tab and then to another one.
658  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Can't play with Terratec phase 24FW on: February 23, 2008, 06:38:30 pm
OK i cancelled the SP install and i'm gonna try playing a wav, with dac set at 32/96.
BSOD again.

I'm gonn ainstall the SP1, i dont see other solutions.
659  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Can't play with Terratec phase 24FW on: February 23, 2008, 06:28:43 pm
It is plain impossible that *and* Needs 24 *and* needs 32 is supported. So put your bets on 32 only, and try now.
Note that it can do "more" than before. If you only have errors now while before something played, then I must be careful with what I did.
So please let know ...

I'm not sure to understand: do you want me to put 32 bit/something in the dac properties and try again to play something?
I decided to go ahead and i'm installing SP1 right now.
660  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Can't play with Terratec phase 24FW on: February 23, 2008, 05:59:15 pm
Is this with a normal WAV now ?

And again ... Vista/SP1 ?

Yes, vista x32 no SP.

I googled and found these:
http://www.osronline.com/ddkx/stream/pcdesign_9y1z.htm

Could be related to the mainboard (which bios i cannot update), to nvidia graphics drivers (unlikely), to terratec drivers (most likely), or to something you changed in xxhe between u0 and u1.
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.169 seconds with 12 queries.