XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
April 29, 2024, 05:18:30 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Os-x yosemite driver? on: January 12, 2015, 12:19:31 am
Thank You Bob. Not sure where your help in here springs from ...

1. Although I don't own a NOS1a, it does greatly interest me as a clever design that I'd like to audition eventually.

2. I've been a Mac user for 24 years, and I've developed AppleScripts, etc for managing my music library, so I like to do what I can to facilitate the Mac as a platform for computer audio.


What is reliable for making a backup of an iMac ? One which was little later provided with Bootcamp ? One which extends the Bootcamp partition with a FAT USB disk (which requires tweaks under Windows I could do (and are not readily available) but which makes me reluctant to say the least to go the backup and restore route in the first place).

Bombich "Carbon Copy Cloner" is the backup program I use.  It is the highest regarded program for carefully preserving all the hidden files, permissions, Bootcamp partition, recovery partition, etc.  It has a fully functioning 30-day free trial.

http://bombich.com

The help in the Help menu is the same as the online help, so it probably is easier to view the instructions online.  I believe there are instructions in Nederlandse, too.

http://bombich.com/kb/ccc4/how-set-up-your-first-backup
2  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Os-x yosemite driver? on: January 11, 2015, 09:07:29 pm
One more hint to drivers which won't install hence leave the old stuff be :

First off you won't notice this. The green OK tells you all is fine, while nothing happened (thank you Apple). One of the (totally stupid) reasons is this (and please correct when better data is available) :

The increment of a version number is tracked by OSX. This - and this seems to be new - means that no "newer" version like 2.0.1 can be installed over a 2.0.8 already running. Really so, and this is reason #1 as it seems to me that you can't revert (to 2.0.7.). But delete mentioned files and all looks to be good, while *still* something is in there knowing about this.
In the end I could not fully track this because these kind of issues I ran into on 10.7, at that time not knowing yet that things so much changed that 10.8 is required for minimum.

When you replace an extension by simple Finder copy (drag-and-drop) rather than running the Apple Installer program, I do not believe OS X cares whether the new extension is a higher or lower version number.  (Although I have to admit that I am not using Yosemite.) 

The usual cause of an extension update being ignored is that the old extension remains in cache.  OS X does not notice that you installed a different version of an extension if you merely copied it in the Finder instead of using the Apple Installer program.

The solution is to clear the extensions cache in one of two ways:

1. The "touch" command in my previous reply #36.  However, I made a mistake: I specified the Extensions folder for OS X 10.8 and earlier, not the new one for Mavericks and Yosemite.  The "touch" command for the latter is:
sudo touch /Library/Extensions/

2. A completely foolproof method, although extra steps, is to restart the Mac in "Safe" mode by holding down the Shift key after you hear the startup chime until you see a horizontal thermometer icon (representing the progress of the fsck operation).  Login in Safe mode, then restart again normally.


Side note: I can't upgrade my 10.7 to anywhere because of a perceived non-GUID partition I don't know anything about (that particular iMac was just bought running from an Apple Shop but with the notice that I installed Bootcam on it later).

GUID versus AFS is a property of the entire hard drive, not of an individual partition.  To convert a drive to GUID you must completely erase the drive, recreate the desired partitions, then restore the data from a backup.  Instructions at:

http://support.apple.com/HT201723
or
http://bombich.com/kb/ccc4/preparing-your-backup-disk-backup-os-x
3  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Os-x yosemite driver? on: January 11, 2015, 03:18:16 am
It has prevented dropouts with certain audio device (DAC) drivers.  I do not know whether it will help with Peter's driver, but it is worth trying, and I do not believe it can make anything worse.

As stated in the ComputerAudiophile posting I referenced, you can revert to normal OS X defaults using:
sudo nvram -d boot-args

You must restart the Mac for any of these changes to take effect.

Another tip:
When installing an updated version of a device driver, the following command, followed by a restart, clears the cache to ensure that the new driver is used rather than the old driver:
sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions/
4  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Os-x yosemite driver? on: January 11, 2015, 12:39:44 am
Coen, you might try the following Terminal command:
sudo nvram boot-args="dart=0x0 kext-dev-mode=1"

as discussed in posts 201 and 203 here:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/official-os-x-yosemite-thread-22030/index6.html#post368663
5  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Os-x yosemite driver? on: November 21, 2014, 10:36:39 am
Obtaining a "license" for the things which need to be done here takes 6-8 weeks, and that is easily rejected. So I hope Apple reads this: because of this uncertanty "we" use licenses from someone else because otherwise it is undoable. "We" = a whole world. This is not even illegal but the "publisher" is not Phasure now and this may look strange. But it is what I chose for.
It is not really about the programming on the driver (which sure is what I do myself) but about generating the "build". And it is this part which all the time fails because of an Apple change in 10.10 with (as it looks) no downward compatibility. In itself such a thing happens more often, but in this case the install itself fails in a destructive way which can't be turned around. Or maybe now, because the guys helping me also need guessing while they can't try it themselves because all had to start with an install like Coen's (or my own) which needs to fail first in order to mimic the behavior.

Peter, I believe you can speed up the beta testing if some users are willing to disable Yosemite's "kernel extension signing" by storing the "kext-dev-mode=1" parameter in nvram as described in the first Step 5 here:
http://www.cindori.org/trim-enabler-and-yosemite/
6  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Ikea´s Beddinge to improve your SQ! on: July 29, 2013, 12:22:00 am
unhappy I don't see it here in So California.

It's in the US online catalog:
http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/90201532/

Not to be confused with this larger cushion:
http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/S29874242/
7  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Phasure at California Audio Show on: July 29, 2013, 12:14:58 am
I didn't realize that you created a separate business division for Phasure that has its own management (in addition to yourself, presumably).  Is this just for USA distribution?

Anyway, please post an update here if you receive any more information about Phasure's activities at the show.  Thanks!
8  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / California Audio Show in August on: July 28, 2013, 06:18:24 am
Peter, XXHighEnd is listed as an exhibitor at this show near San Francisco.  Will you actually be there, or does this merely mean a dealer is including the Phasure DAC in his system?
9  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Tweeter overload? on: October 21, 2012, 12:41:23 am
Thanks, Peter.

Regarding even one resistor of the highest quality killing the sound, my power amplifier has a few resistors, so I guess the sound is close to death by the time it reaches the loudspeakers Happy
10  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: Tweeter overload? on: October 20, 2012, 07:14:22 pm
I apologize that my question was unclear.  I was not referring to the software-implemented low-pass filtering in the digital domain.  I was referring to the absence of any analog low-pass filter after the D/A conversion.

The analog signal produced by the D/A conversion stage will not be smoothly continuous, but will look like a staircase, with sudden steps between each sample.  Therefore, pulses at the sample rate (not the Nyquist rate which is half the sample rate) will be superimposed on the audio signal.  In other words, the analog signal will look sort of like a pulse train at the sample rate that is amplitude-modulated by the audio signal.
11  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Tweeter overload? on: October 20, 2012, 10:27:48 am
I don't understand why the Phasure DAC, or any other DAC without low pass filtering, does not damage tweeters.

It seems to me that the DAC would output a pulse train whose frequency equals the sample rate and whose amplitude is only a few dB lower than the amplitude of the audio signal.

Music normally has treble content that is a small fraction of the total music power, so tweeters do not have to be designed to handle as much power as woofers.  It seems that continuously outputting 192 or 384 KHz pulses at a 10 watt power level would risk burning out a tweeter.

Am I overlooking something?

On the other hand, it's possible that one of the reasons the Phasure DAC sounds good is that superimposing an ultrasonic signal on the music reduces tweeter distortion due to hysteresis near the zero crossing, sort of like the ultrasonic bias signal used in magnetic tape recording.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 12 queries.