Peter,

I know him very well. He is a passionate audiophile and would never manipulate something or open the Lush.
It is simple that he tried some USB cables in the past and was not satisfied.

Matt

Hi Peter,
the shipping of the Lush would go to a german address and in the case of dissatisfaction he would pay the shipping back from Germany to you, so the refund would be related to the price of cable only.

Matt

Hi Peter,

a russian friend, who does not speak english, asked my whether there is a right to return the Lush in the case not being satisfied.

Thanks

Matt

AFAIK, on CA most prefer the USPCB to the Curious.
And there seems to be a tendency to prefer the Lush to the USPCB.
So some sort of indirect comparison:-)

Matt

Hi,
read hols comment from CA:

https://www.computeraudiophile.com/forums/topic/30376-a-novel-way-to-massively-improve-the-sq-of-the-sms-200-and-microrendu/?page=123#comment-697231

Matt

Hi Peter,

is there a certain length for the Lush where it sounds best?
Thanks

Matt

http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?17558-Cessaro-s-Super-Amp-Munich&p=317740&viewfull=1#post317740

KR Matt

The new DAC is more Revolution than Evolution.

Matt

Thanks, Peter,

is there an estimated price range for the most basic version of the PhD1 (two channel, no DSP, no amps)?

Matt

It would be very nice to get the PhD1 without DSP..........
Thanks.
Matt

Peter,
is it possible to get a PhD1 without DSP module?

Matt

PhD1
Phasure/DSD/1 ?

Excellent

Matt

PHASURE LEGOS

Matt

Sorry, Peter,
but I think the same. This name is way too long. You need one name for the make PHASURE and one additional name MODULAR or something else, but not two names. It is the same with your son. I am sure you call your son by one name, like I do with my son and not by a double name. And a DAC is something like a child .........

KR
Matt

Reading what Peter wrote on the CA forum.....
Maybe to keep in mind : What this design explicitly will do is run PCM and DSD through the 100% same hardware, logic and (sampling) speed (PCMx256 and DSDx256 but DSD can be higher in a later stage); only then the formats can be compared like apples with apples which sort of has become my search (or obsession) for life. The filtering obviously will be different for both situations and for 2 channels this will be in-PC so the (different) processing load of that (current draw etc.) will not be able to influence the in-DAC electronics (this latter since the total isolation introduced with the "a" version of the NOS1).
..... I have to say for me - as a DSD lover -  this is the best thing for years.

Matt