XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
April 28, 2024, 03:57:26 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
556  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: Back on track! on: May 06, 2013, 10:36:24 am
Back on track!

Lately, family and work have occupied my life, leaving little time to fiddle with the Hi-Fi for many months. However a couple of weeks ago I finally got around to do something I have planned for a year: Trying out new loudspeaker positions in my living room. And, wow, what difference. What improvement!


http://www.cardas.com/room_setup_main.php

for information
557  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Bad Bass on: April 23, 2013, 10:24:55 am
http://www.stereophile.com/content/listening-124
558  Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Power Cords on: April 08, 2013, 05:59:51 pm
http://www.theaudiobeat.com/visits/shunyata_visit_interview.htm
559  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: A New Route For Digital Replay? on: March 23, 2013, 10:02:27 am
My Attention is more to the minimized/own OS and stripped down MoBo.

Joachim
560  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / A New Route For Digital Replay? on: March 23, 2013, 08:44:01 am
http://www.lessloss.com/laminar-streamer-sd-player-p-207.html
561  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Peak Extension AGAIN on: March 14, 2013, 04:33:03 pm
Yea, but you were already banned to ...
well, somewhere far away. Or ?

hehe


Cool, we three, Mani, Coen and me are then ready for the madhouse ............. .

Never had time for a serious A/B comparison, but now …… .

The release 0.9z-7.5 has the best “sound staging”, “tonal balance” and “coherence” with the right size of the instruments.
(see a previous note by Stefano too - http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=2490.msg25926#msg25926)

On my system I get the best results with the memory management “mixed” (better sound staging).

I’m in a concert by Chick Corea tomorrow and then I can compare XXH with the real Live.

Joachim
562  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Peak Extension AGAIN on: March 14, 2013, 01:22:26 pm
I have the odd experience that the detrimental effect of HDCD "on" is also audible with non-HDCD material.
When cofiguring a new XXHE version this is usually the first feature I disable.

regards, Coen

I have the same impression. Something is going on.

Joachim
563  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Which track am I listening to? on: March 11, 2013, 11:59:57 pm
Listening to Mahler 8 with settings in my signature. OK had a couple of stops "data did not arrive ......" but now a bigger problem is that in the middle of a track suddenly another track starts playing with no gap.

Paul

Hi,

I had to change from "straight contiguous" to "mixed"

Joachim
564  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 07, 2013, 12:06:26 pm
Quote
The memory load seems to influence the SQ.

Nope. The SFS is.

This is what I hear too ("sfs" is important NOT "max sfs").

Regards, Coen

I learned the interrelation SFS/memory again. (I'm getting older)
But to be precise (hair-splitting) in physical terms we hear datas from memory. (see graphs in the Task Manager)

Next.

I do hear the 3D soundstage with my settings in Attended mode only.

With the Unattended mode the accentuated left/right separation etc. is there again.

Joachim
565  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 06, 2013, 04:25:45 pm
Quote
The memory load seems to influence the SQ.

Nope. The SFS is. You can (finally Happy) see it on your own text now. If "memory load" as such would play "the" role, your A result would have been the same as B.


Ok, we technicians say "cause and effect"
SFS influences the memory load.

But the PC/OS is reacting differently with engaging the button "Max the same as SFS" under the item A and B

Joachim


566  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 06, 2013, 03:33:28 pm

 I have no "holographic soundstage" experience (never did either), but I can support that there is a phenomenal instrument separation.

Here is an interesting article

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/49247-32-holographic-soundstage

from "Anonymous  04-20-2004 at 01:38:01 PM"
567  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 06, 2013, 03:27:14 pm
And in both situations your SFS (not Max) was at ?

Bloody hell .............. .

A) First experience: button "Max the same as SFS" not engaged // SFS =2; SFSmax=241. Memory load is well below 1000MB. Result: accentuated left/right separation and the music plays at the wall behind the speakers. CPU activity: minor

B) button "Max the same as SFS" engaged // both SFS=241. Memory load is well above 1000MB. Result: 3D dimensional soundstage. CPU activity: much more than under A + C

C) button "Max the same as SFS" engaged // both SFS=2,0. Memory load is well below 1000MB. Result: accentuated left/right separation and the music plays at the wall behind the speakers. CPU activity: minor

The memory load seems to influence the SQ.

Joachim

EDIT: with Attended
568  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 06, 2013, 12:52:59 pm
Quote
SFS min back to 220,

Never mind my SFS Max = SQ related story ...

From that other topic I now derived that you just changed the SFS and not the SFS Max "only".

Difficult, communication ... Happy


Hi Peter,

changed SFS max as follows.


1. Replay with SFS max 241, stopped the file and
2. changed SFS max to 2,0 , now a replay with the accentuated left/right separation of the SQ
3. stopped the replay and changed SFS max back to 241. Started the file new and have now a holographic SQ again.

See the changes of memory volume in the taskmanager.

Joachim
569  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: 0.9z-8-2 - Memory management on: March 05, 2013, 05:41:26 pm
So, OK.

Hi Peter,

you see that I'm using Wave files, and my understanding was that nearly no activity of the CPU is necessary during replay.
On previous releases I did not notice this 100% peaks.

Joachim
570  Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 0.9z-8-2 (Windows 7) on: March 05, 2013, 05:33:26 pm
Quote
SFS min back to 220,

Never mind my SFS Max = SQ related story ...

From that other topic I now derived that you just changed the SFS and not the SFS Max "only".

Difficult, communication ... Happy

Hi Peter,

the SFS is 220 now, there is no spread  anymore. (before SFS min=2, SFS max=220)

Joachim
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.167 seconds with 12 queries.