Ah Dan - So you are one of these "friends in the neighbourhood" Tim wrote about over at CA ...
Interesting. I never saw the connection with Tim to your question here from November, until yesterday.
Peter
Peter,
Just to be clear, I don't have a horse in this race. I have no business ties with Tim. I like him, and I respect him, but I've seen him only three or four times since I met him about five months ago. What I heard in his system was impressive - in my recollection, the best I've ever heard. It would be interesting to see, if possible, how much of the Pyramix sound comes from their hardware versus their software. No choice but to use their drivers, but I would hope one would be able to use another application, like XXHE, with their card. I'd rather not be locked into one vendor for everything. Also, my admittedly limited experience with a full-blown DAW, Solitude, is that it has way too much functionality for simple music playback. It's hard to imagine sitting my friends in front of the console and allowing them to select the next album. I would guess that Pyramix is similar. (I only listened at Tim's. I didn't get my hands on it.) And of course there's the cost. I don't believe there's anything official about the $12k number a CA reader through out there, but it's bound to be appreciably costlier than my current Lynx card and XXHE. At what price, Hi-fi? Like I said previously, I'm anxious to A/B Pyramix vs. XXHE/Lynx/Berkeley in my system. If the Pyramix solution sounds better, I'll have to decide if it's enough better to justify the price and to live with a potentially awkward interface. The bar is pretty high: I'm very happy with the sound of XXHE, and I look forward to hearing Engine 4 on my Windows 7 system. The UI could still use a bit of work though.
Dan