XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
May 29, 2022, 02:37:58 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
1  Ultimate Audio Playback / Music Storage and convenient playback / Re: Due Remote features : URGENT QUESTION to all ! on: May 28, 2012, 07:10:27 pm
one for me (I will use it with iPad).
2  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: W2008 R2 anyone ? on: January 28, 2012, 03:57:14 pm
Peter you were right, finally moved back to Win7 SP1 with Mini OS functionality - sounds indeed better than W2008 SP2.

3  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: PC Tweak for NOS1 async USB on: January 28, 2012, 03:51:09 pm
I have SOTM USB in my system and the best combination for the sound quality is when I use SOTM for my keyboard and WiFi, and plug my NOS1 to one of computers integrated USB ports. NOS1 is the exclusive device using integrated USB ports. I know you might consider this stupid, but NOS1 sounds the best to me when plugged to the mainboard.

4  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: W2008 R2 anyone ? on: January 25, 2012, 07:14:24 pm
Hi Peter,

I have Windows 2008 Service Pack 2 (not R2) 64-bit, and in empty playlist area I have
XXHighEnd Vista/S.

I am very happy with Win2008, to me it sounds the best from all Windows family.

Best regards
5  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: NOS1 SQ to next level possible ? on: January 21, 2012, 08:06:40 pm
I see most of you guys have Clock Resolution in XXHighEnd set to 15 ms, whilst I have 0,5 ms. Truly, in my system it sounds less digital and edgy when clock is 0,5ms than 15 ms.

I have bigger room ambiance and the soundstage with dbPoweramp target set to 24/192 than to 16/44,1. It sounds "richer" then regular rip, more like hi-resolution tracks. Maybe it is artificial, I do not know - I like it more at least with XXHighEnd and NOS1.

I can hear also a difference between Windows 2008 SP2 and Windows 7 SP1 (both 64-bit). I have them on dual boot. I think that sound from Win2008 is more pleasing. I cannot find a better words to describe it. Win2008 has better combination of resolution and emotionality.

As regards to SFS I like setting of 120. It is OK for me, I do not feel it sounds any worse than 430 in my system.

6  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: NOS1 SQ to next level possible ? on: January 20, 2012, 08:07:28 pm
Hi Peter,

maybe I should start the next topic, but it is still related to my tests to get the best sound and NOS1.

I have i5 660 processor, and if I specify SFS of 200 I have sometimes breakes in music. If I specify 430 I have 1-3 seconds brakes between tracks. I specified 120 and now is OK. I see you and most of NOS1 guys have SFS 400 . Should I upgrade to better processor ?

Also, physically I have 2 core processor, but system sees 4 cores. How many cores does XXHighEnd see ? Is it a metter to switch hyperthreading on/off somewhere ? What should I set then ?

Thank you

7  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: NOS1 SQ to next level possible ? on: January 17, 2012, 10:36:44 pm
Sure, just updated it below.
8  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / Re: NOS1 SQ to next level possible ? on: January 17, 2012, 07:14:39 pm
Theoretical considerations are important, but... try and hear it for your own ears.

My ears tell me that I got MUCH better sound when ripping regular CD by dbPowerump to 24/192 wave and then playing it with XXHighEnd x16 than ripping to native format 16/44,1 and playing also with XXHighEnd x16.

I got nothing but bright sound. The sound is very detailed in a right way. The soundstage is huge, stable and sound is perfect, at least in my system of course.

9  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: Problem with the second track on: January 16, 2012, 10:19:37 pm
Hi Peter,

I got the same problem with second track today. I played 24/192 album, and got message "No track:, or similar, than "The file does not exists" or something. On second trial everything was OK.

10  Ultimate Audio Playback / Phasure NOS1 DAC / NOS1 SQ to next level possible ? on: January 16, 2012, 08:23:45 pm
YES. Here is my experience, try for yourself and share your impression.

Rip your favorite CD by using dbPoweramp to Wave and specify format target as 24/192. Play it with NOS1 USB and 32/768kHz / ARC prediction. I did it and almost got fiver because of it ! Now I am reripping my favorite CDs to 24/192 to hear them all again !

Peter, congratulation for your work ! Another happy owner of NOS1 is here !

11  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / ALAC files on: November 05, 2011, 03:38:57 pm
Hello Peter,

Do you plan to support ALAC ? It is open source format now.


If somebody wants to use his music library for PC and MAC (as I do with NOS1), this is the best choice format I suppose.

12  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / e-mail problem on: November 03, 2011, 04:06:03 pm
Hi Peter,
I cannot send you e-mail, tried today from 3 different accounts. Your server reports as follows:

#< #5.0.0 X-Postfix; cannot access mailbox /var/spool/mail/phcom_sales for user phcom_sales. error writing message: File too large> #SMTP#

Can you fix it ? I am trying to report a problem...

13  Ultimate Audio Playback / XXHighEnd Support / Re: 0.9z-4-1 SFS limit ? on: February 28, 2011, 12:33:05 pm
Hello Peter,

can you explain the SFS allocation limits on 64-bit system with plenty of memery ?

I have 16GB RAM on 64bit Windows Vista Ultimate.
Looking into task manager I see 1,4GB allocated memory after sturtup (Vista is hungry).
Why I cannot allocate maximum SC of about 400 or 500 ? There is not any continues memory block in such big memory space ?
Maybe 64-bit XXHighEnd would be a big step up in this case, you omit 32-bit limit...

Thank you
14  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Audio Show on: November 08, 2010, 10:52:22 pm
Roy and Marcin,

the case alone with 12 inch touch LCD without power supply costs about 1k Euro. Please add
- fanless power supply / no fans (and find one that is good for the sound)
- Win7 ultimate
- ultra low power 4-core processor + passive heatsink / no fans
- 16GB ram
- 2TB low power HDD
- 64 fast SSD
- professional sound card (Lynx or RME) that has clock i/o and digital output only for the best sound
- wireless keyboard with touch pad
- IR remote control
- Wifi

No way to get the above hardware / system for less than 4k Euro when you buy parts only. Where is cost of assembly, set-up, configuration, and finally software licenses for ripping and playback ?

The final produict price is not a sum of components price. It is always more, sometimes 10x more, especialy in high-end business.

I assume, you can make 2k Euro computer, but this is not the same computer as above. Of that I am sure.

15  Ultimate Audio Playback / Chatter and forum related stuff / Re: Audio Show on: November 08, 2010, 09:49:33 pm

it is a polish habit : laughing at somebody's work. You my think whatever you wish to think - this is true. But writing negative words, publishing a picture in a public forum about somebodys work - that is different. If you are sure you may do better, why do not you do better ? And much cheapper than 6k Euro, of course.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 3.294 seconds with 12 queries.