31
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: JPlay Part Deux: A new controversy?...
|
on: December 06, 2010, 10:53:08 am
|
Peter, but it's like comparing apples and oranges, you know - to many variables IMHO, but sure everyone can have his own opinion, I didn't mean to criticize or sth. I just wanted to rather point few, in my opinion, important differences: - Kernel Streaming vs. WASAPI - double arc prediction vs. native 16/44 - ultra low buffer vs. higher - and finally Q2, Q3 at 30 I think that a 'fair' comparison would be with XXHE set to Engine#3, the same buffer size and playing native 16/44, but that's my opinion If Calibrator prefers what he does then good for him! But I can reply to his post, can I? And you know that I also have dCS Elgar Plus with RME-AES32 in dual AES configuration. The dCS can work in 24/192 in dual AES only, other inputs are limited to 24/96, so I don't think I'm gonna switch to JULI@, which lacks BNC for word clock BTW. I see that you're a bit frustrated that someone could prefer other player? I get it, but you don't have to search for weak points in my system to rationalize my statement, because that what this meant, right - 'of course, if you use the soundcard not to passthrough (but use the analogue outs) it's another matter - and I think you do the latter. Well, *that* would be no sot "valid" I think ... (you will be one out of 100, roughly estimated).'Cheers, Marcin
|
|
|
36
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / Re: JPlay Part Deux: A new controversy?...
|
on: December 05, 2010, 11:59:03 pm
|
Wow - thanks guys! Well, let me add my bit. It sounds really, really nice. The low-level detail is quite astonishing. Well done! Mani PS. Latest listening done with 64-bit version. PPS. It still doesn't like being installed and being run from my RAMDisk... I have the same problem on W2008, not on W2008 R2 though... I kind of agree with boleary regarding 'the weight' or 'body', but I like it better than XXHE anyway at the moment and maybe it's supposed to be this way, I mean - I feel that this is more lifelike and instruments, vocals sound very natural
|
|
|
39
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Playback Tweaks and Source related subjects / SQ inconsistency
|
on: December 05, 2010, 10:38:29 am
|
Have you ever wondered why your PC 'sounds' better one day and worse another and this is without making any changes in player or OS? Well, here's a clue - ever heard of system timer resolution? The default value is 15.6ms, but some applications can force the windows timer resolution e.g. Media Player, iTunes, WinAmp, Flash all set the timer resolution to 1ms. The interesting thing is that this change is global so all applications get the new high resolution timer while one of these applications are running. So gentlemen, start your browsers with some lightweight flash content and play some tunes How crazy is that? You can view your system timer interval with that small tool: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897568.aspxstart it from CMD Peter, you should be able to set the timer in XXHE as well. Best regards, Marcin
|
|
|
41
|
Ultimate Audio Playback / Your thoughts about the Sound Quality / Re: 9-Z3
|
on: December 03, 2010, 12:04:18 am
|
Mani, XXHE sounds more musical, because you use SFS.ini=21 and larger SFS. Set the SFS.ini to 00, SFS to 12 MB, Scheme-1 and try again You might discover the opposite. And make sure to manually copy the tracks to RAMdisk. Cheers, Marcin
|
|
|
|