XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
January 19, 2017, 02:05:03 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Dec. 31, 2012 : XXHighEnd + Phasure NOS1 DAC receive 6moons Blue Moon Award !
** "Lonely at the very top" **
Search current board structure only !!  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
 61 
 on: January 12, 2017, 01:11:55 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
... as soon as I close it, XXHighEnd.exe gets replaced by the previous 2.06a version. I'll try to replicate this and take a few screen shots.

Everything does seem to work now, but I thought I'd share these just in case there is something untoward still going on.

Mani.

 62 
 on: January 12, 2017, 01:05:44 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
I think I already know what is going on ... your super duper non-NTFS system !

Nah, the c: drive is a regular drive. Anyway, see above...

Mani.

 63 
 on: January 12, 2017, 01:04:40 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
Ahhhhh... All solved.

The problem seems to have been using a screen shortcut for XX, with 'run as administrator' checked, which is what I've always done for software players. Everything works fine if this is not checked.

Mani.

 64 
 on: January 12, 2017, 01:03:54 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by PeterSt
I think I already know what is going on ... your super duper non-NTFS system !

 65 
 on: January 12, 2017, 12:52:06 pm 
Started by Leo - Last post by Leo
Hello Peter, probably a mistake by me of some sort but whatever I try the base volume cannot be detached when in OS RAM ( 14923). I did not pay much attention to this message before and just removed the os disk when booted in RAM. But after reading more in the tutorials this is not the proper way probably. I have made sure all the referred to files are identical in both 14923 OS (ram and not-so-ram). What steps can I take to remedy this? regards, Leo

 66 
 on: January 12, 2017, 12:51:36 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
OK, there is something strange going on...

I have managed to get 2.07 working on my music server. BUT... as soon as I close it, XXHighEnd.exe gets replaced by the previous 2.06a version. I'll try to replicate this and take a few screen shots.

Mani.

 67 
 on: January 12, 2017, 12:17:25 pm 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
All I did was extract the 2.07 upgrade patch into the 2.0x folder where 2.06a was sitting, and working perfectly. I've just checked all the rights to this folder and everything seems OK.

Anyway, I have just created a new 2.06a folder and extracted 2.06 and then the 2.06a patch to it. 2.06a seems to be working fine. I will extract the 2.07 patch over this and see what happens.

Mani.

 68 
 on: January 12, 2017, 11:43:55 am 
Started by manisandher - Last post by PeterSt
Mani,

OK. What about the rights to that folder or all the files ? Something should be wrong with it ...
(for example, when you first copy all to a CD and then to the hdd, something like this can happen)

Peter

 69 
 on: January 12, 2017, 09:33:34 am 
Started by manisandher - Last post by manisandher
The path on the music server is C:\XXHighEnd\2.0x.

Mani.

 70 
 on: January 12, 2017, 09:13:15 am 
Started by Tore - Last post by PeterSt
Hi Gerard,

Yes, I know. Now wait until I tell you the fees for this fun. If you read the document (which you apparently did) then you've seen GBP 5000 - 20000 to be expected. The latter will be the first situation mentioned and the former possibly this last situation. Now let's wonder who is going to pay this. 100 of you for 50GBP per person ? I wonder. Maybe it is 10 ad 500 the person. And because of that it is zero persons.

Maybe others can help out, but it looks like that the whole idea of "adopts to the ADC used" story has disappeared from the encoding. In the past I read about this; today nothing any more (but this doesn't necessarily tell all). So what will MQA be then ?
Hires !!!
Yahoooo

Uhm, ... but I already have those and I don't like it.
So if MQA will only be about smaller sized Hires which even has been manipulated (and things surely do NOT look good at this moment) and all what people shout about is that it sounds different while everybody says it sounds better (we know us), then nobody will even like to have it for free.

Please notice that for the time being I can still say things about this. But this will end today or tomorrow because of being under NDA (I already am) and will receive non-public information soon.

Best regards,
Peter

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.264 seconds with 15 queries.