XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
August 31, 2015, 02:30:14 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Dec. 31, 2012 : XXHighEnd + Phasure NOS1 DAC receive 6moons Blue Moon Award !
** "Lonely at the very top" **
Search current board structure only !!  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
 71 
 on: August 18, 2015, 05:48:41 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by PeterSt
Seems quite unbelievable anyway, Todd.

 72 
 on: August 18, 2015, 05:36:00 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by toddn
Ah yes, I see now. micro volts vs. millivolts

Thank you Peter.

 73 
 on: August 18, 2015, 05:21:32 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by PeterSt
Todd, I only say this so that Anthony doesn't need to possibly embarrass someone :

Anthony talks about 14uV at 8 Amperes, while you talk about 250uV at 8 Amperes.
Also from your picture I can derive that at 8 Amperes it will merely be 1000uV.

Quote
then play with the "good" power supplies (say 1mV RMS noise @8A

1mV = 1000uV

Now that is out, please continue. Happy Happy

Great stuff ...
Peter


PS: And nobody claims that there will be a SQ difference.
Yet.

PPS: Getting something to run seems to be more crucial. At least at first (like in : mine didn't want to boot, no matter Anthony's sequence which I also tried).

 74 
 on: August 18, 2015, 05:09:32 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by PeterSt
Todd, I have resized your image a bit, so it is better readable.

Thanks,
Peter

 75 
 on: August 18, 2015, 05:01:24 pm 
Started by christoffe - Last post by PeterSt
Hi Joachim,

Yes, nice. But it doesn't work. I saw it myself in your PC, and Gerard too, tells about a second time.
Paul I don't know, but I already don't care any more.

When a newer build is around the corner I will be happy to hear about it, so I can investigate the decency-status of it.
Ok ?

Best regards and thanks !
Peter

 76 
 on: August 18, 2015, 04:58:08 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by toddn
Hi Anthony,

I have 3 separate Acopian high grade power supply's with .25mv ripple and .005% line regulation, one for each MB voltage rail. (See attached spec. sheet.) I've been meaning to use your wiring & power up sequence research cheat sheet to give them a try, just haven't gotten around to it.

I'll try to get to it this weekend and report my results here. Maybe it will provide some additional useful information. I hope so anyway.

Todd

 77 
 on: August 18, 2015, 04:49:53 pm 
Started by christoffe - Last post by christoffe

One other example which is NOT meant to make it personal, but to indicate how difficult things can be, which not everybody can see, including yourself :
You are as far as I can tell the only one who could not get the 1.04 driver going. You said you applied all. But you did not and instead skipped the XXHighEnd settings at first. I know (your system shows that). This, btw, is when I told you that "sequences" are as important as applying the subjects involved in the first place.


Hi Peter,

This statement is not correct, see

http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3185.msg34653#msg34653   on: 2015, May 11.
http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3237.0  on: June 07, 2015,
http://www.phasure.com/index.php?topic=3248.0 on: June 09, 2015

Joachim

 78 
 on: August 18, 2015, 03:00:23 pm 
Started by PeterSt - Last post by PeterSt
Whhoow ... I just finished ordering the parts for a complete 2 channel NOS2.

It always takes the most time to source the parts (where to find them / where to really obtain them from (is also $$$ related)). This time it took me over 3 full days.

A total of 120 order lines, spread over 4 suppliers.
This means 120 different parts.

If I count right, it is 2886 parts, excluding the cabinet, wiring, input/output terminals, switches, a display, remote and possibly more unimportant stuff.
And those 2886 parts all need to be soldered.

See you in a year ?

scratching

Peter

 79 
 on: August 18, 2015, 01:14:33 pm 
Started by acg - Last post by AlainGr
This is still something I would like to apply to my audio PC, since I believe that correcting problems right at the source may eliminate the need to apply "band aids" further down the chain...

Regards,

Alain

 80 
 on: August 18, 2015, 10:40:55 am 
Started by christoffe - Last post by PeterSt
Thank you for your extended elaboration, Joachim.

I think the (main) problem is that you call it "works flawlessly" while actually nothing works.
So what you (have to) do next is apply all kind of unnecessary stuff to get it to work for what you think is OK (for your ears - which is fine) and next advise it to others.

This, while all conflicts which what is already in there.
And seriously, it does not matter whether it is about defender, updates, eliminating services or MMCSS (and all more, mentioned so far) - this is all explicitly dealt with by XXHighEnd THUS per different means.
Sorry about the emphasized "thus" but I obviously know.

Maybe an example :
How can I guide someone to Group Policy stuff to eliminate Defender, while first something else has eliminated the whole option from there ? (this is about Esau's link). Please keep in mind that the Tutorials are there already.
No such things as Tutorials upon a STANDARD OS can exist if people first tear it down per various (unknown !) means.

One other example which is NOT meant to make it personal, but to indicate how difficult things can be, which not everybody can see, including yourself :
You are as far as I can tell the only one who could not get the 1.04 driver going. You said you applied all. But you did not and instead skipped the XXHighEnd settings at first. I know (your system shows that). This, btw, is when I told you that "sequences" are as important as applying the subjects involved in the first place.
So I had to make another "tweak" for people like you (and hey, this is thus not about you - it can happen, apparently).
But what nobody knows/sees (as said, including you) is that I can only build these tweaks upon tweaks (the 1.04 driver is a tweak to begin with) if I can trust the base of the system.

Do you seriously think that I could help (you) with determining what has happened to the system if first another means of "MinOS" has been applied while we don't even know what that all is (100s of things) ?

So all in the best spirit, which most certainly counts for you (Joachim) as well. I am 100% confident about that.
But you must please see through that this is nothing to now advise to others, while it is based upon something nobody has.
 
I hope it is clear now.

Quote
You mentioned with Reply#21 on the forum that it is not your intention to make double work with the “Minimize OS” procedure for the RMT W10

You didn't understand or possibly read half only :
W10 RTM in its 10240 build is more flawed that 10074. This was totally clear to the whole world.
It does not make any sense to again do work for something which is even more flawed.
It first needs another build which works better.


Why are you so persistent ?

Peter

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.393 seconds with 15 queries.