XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
October 24, 2017, 12:20:46 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
 71 
 on: October 10, 2017, 08:09:01 am 
Started by BertD - Last post by PeterSt
Hi Bert,

In the 2.07 Release Notes search for "time stability" (no quotes) and in there you'll see the procedure to follow.
I am not sure you just told that you did exactly that, so let's have that out of the way first ... OK ?

Regards,
Peter

 72 
 on: October 10, 2017, 08:03:14 am 
Started by Robert - Last post by PeterSt
Hey Robert,

Quote
Interesting from a process of elimination I have discovered that reducing the slider from 16x(705) to 8x(352) the ticking stops. Arc prediction is engaged. Does this mean the computer is running out of power?

No, that seems impossible to me. The playback itself virtually does not use CPU (you can check in Taskmanager). And with Arc Prediction (no Custom Filter) it can't be a bug in the filter programming either.

If it is so that the ticking is constant for its frequency/occurrence, regardless any XXHighEnd setting (but that sampling rate of course) I'd consider "electrical error" and a capacitor doing this to you. This is a bit tough to explain but think like a capacitor loading too much energy (if that would be possible in the first place) and that needing to escape. The loading builds up slowly until it bursts.
I am completely making this up and maybe it can't exist at all, but the lower sampling rate might draw just that little lesser of energy the capacitors must provide.

A software bug in the DAC is much more likely of course, but I think this won't express with the time period you imply (and rather each sample and then you will perceive it just as poor sound).

HTH
Peter

 73 
 on: October 10, 2017, 01:47:09 am 
Started by Robert - Last post by Robert
Thanks I certainly feel the ticks were there before 2.08. It is intermittent, today I loaded Ram OS and screen only reset once and no ticks at all.

I have changed DAC to the Oppo 205 which can take 32/768 files. It has been ticking intermittently since this. Sold Benchmark Dac2 it only ran at 24/192(4x on slider) max.

Interesting from a process of elimination I have discovered that reducing the slider from 16x(705) to 8x(352) the ticking stops. Arc prediction is engaged. Does this mean the computer is running out of power?

Robert



 74 
 on: October 09, 2017, 07:40:00 pm 
Started by BertD - Last post by BertD
Settings when starting XX from the bootdrive (to my idea also the basic configuration for booting into RAM).

From boot drive all is OK, checking the same settings started from RAM not at all...

Is this normal?

The images are from a RAM drive configuration. XX from HDD it shows Stable, Optimal and no need to Sign the drivers...

Bert

 75 
 on: October 09, 2017, 12:49:56 pm 
Started by Robert - Last post by PeterSt
Robert,

Have you considered that it could be your new DAC ?
Can you prove that by means of another DAC, perhaps ?

On a side note : it is quite well possible that with 2.08 you suddenly perceive this (which it has been there prior to 2.08). This is a bit how 2.08 unveils "detail".

Regards,
Peter

 76 
 on: October 09, 2017, 08:31:27 am 
Started by Robert - Last post by Robert
Quote
Is this 16/44.1 or 24/xxx ?

Is the interval of the tick related to the SFS ? -> it should. But you need to try it. So if you can easily perceive it and double the SFS, you should perceive it half of the time from the previous setting.

So far 16/44.1 files.

Changed SFS up to 120/120 and Q settings back to old no difference in ticks. Restarted Ram OS no difference. Funny thing ticks seem to go when playing whole albums after first  track. Crossed out Xx in Ram OS still ticks.

Going back to new settings .9SFS and Q settings still ticks.

Robert

 77 
 on: October 08, 2017, 06:04:20 pm 
Started by briefremarks - Last post by PeterSt
Right David !
Regards,
Peter

 78 
 on: October 08, 2017, 03:19:16 pm 
Started by briefremarks - Last post by dsm
Hi Peter,

Just to clarify this , since I don't have the (a) upgrade yet, the 1.04 driver is not necessary.  Right?

David

 79 
 on: October 08, 2017, 09:00:59 am 
Started by briefremarks - Last post by PeterSt
Hi Ramesh - check your morning's email.

Regards,
Peter

 80 
 on: October 08, 2017, 07:42:37 am 
Started by briefremarks - Last post by briefremarks
This may be something I have missed.  Just checked the driver version in the control panel and see that it is 1.03.  I've never installed a new driver version for NOS1a.  Can someone point me to where I can get latest versions and how to do the upgrade?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.238 seconds with 15 queries.