XXHighEnd - The Ultra HighEnd Audio Player
July 17, 2018, 03:34:57 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: August 6, 2017 : Phasure Webshop open ! Go to the Shop
Search current board structure only !!  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
 1 
 on: July 17, 2018, 01:12:47 pm 
Started by PeterSt - Last post by PeterSt
Quote
Peter, do the entries in the 'SQ relative to Mach II' column still stand in your opinion?

Hey Mani,

Yes. But very far and very theoretically I'd have to dedicated more value (say another +) to the 10/20 which I am using myself. It is just that the emphasis is so much different from what I recall of the 16/32 and 14/28 (which latter two sound very much alike). Also : the more I use the 10/20, the better I can find "the settings" for it (takes time).

I suppose this is not very helpful, so please ask more if needed.

Regards,
Peter

 2 
 on: July 17, 2018, 01:05:59 pm 
Started by PeterSt - Last post by fmanheck
Thank You Professor Peter Thank you !

I love homework assignments. Rules

I'll report back later good

 3 
 on: July 17, 2018, 10:52:01 am 
Started by PeterSt - Last post by manisandher
Number of Cores    Original Price     Current Price    As of date    Linear PSU    SQ relative to Mach II   
8/1627002700May 18, 2018Yes?
10/2029802980May 18, 2018   Yes++
12/2433003300May 18, 2018   Yes?
14/2839003900May 18, 2018   Yes++++
16/3243504375May 31, 2018   Yes++++
20/4050005150May 31, 2018   Yes?
22/4463006350May 31, 2018   Yes?

Peter, do the entries in the 'SQ relative to Mach II' column still stand in your opinion?

Mani.

 4 
 on: July 16, 2018, 01:53:11 pm 
Started by Robert - Last post by PeterSt
Robert,

In that case, if all is right, you were really protected by the CrackDetect functionality. I mean, without that I think it would have been a lot of noise.

Best regards,
Peter

 5 
 on: July 16, 2018, 01:51:52 pm 
Started by fralippo - Last post by PeterSt
Fralippo,

It may be hard to believe, but yesterday I could repeatedly let it go wrong from within the Show/Compare Tracks function (and load tracks from there - which in itself doesn't work for 2.10, so I was working on that).
Today, now want to solve it from there, it won't go wrong any more. Not from within that function. Or is it again the particular album(s - there were more) ??

Anyway, will try your example now in due time.
Thank you for sending it.

Peter

 6 
 on: July 16, 2018, 12:51:40 pm 
Started by fralippo - Last post by fralippo
Files just sent. Sorry for the delay and thank you!

 7 
 on: July 16, 2018, 10:04:37 am 
Started by Robert - Last post by Robert
Yes thats correct.

 8 
 on: July 16, 2018, 08:02:22 am 
Started by PeterSt - Last post by PeterSt
I am not giving up either. You should grab the one nobody is speaking of love this

Hi Fred,

Remember the dialed in settings as of now. Then try these :
SFS=140.19
Q1=30
xQ1=11
Q3,4,5=1
ClockRes=15
CoreAppointment=3-5
NOS1 Driver Buffer = 16

(this gives sluggish response on about everything but Stop - I don't care a bit).

For me this does miracles with the 10-20. Now I like to know your (relative) perception with the 14-28.

Thank you Fred,
Peter

 9 
 on: July 16, 2018, 07:56:48 am 
Started by Robert - Last post by PeterSt
Quote
Has anyone tried new settings?

Even if "they" do, they prefer to remain silent. Must be the weather. Happy

Anyway, I have, but I may not be the most representative by now (Stealth III and such) :
SFS=140.19 (don't ask about the .19) and Q1 x xQ1=30 x 11.
All other still the same.

If possible this brings even more "mid" detail again with the notice I am using the 10-20 core Stealth III version.
Maybe you can try it too and maybe it brings you a similar change ?
Small warning : I do not recognize anything of this mid or highs etc. special detail from even the Mach II, so posssibly for you there is no change at all, except for what we were used to (and then for Mach II similar to any PC as far as I can/could tell). Still curious though ...

Thank you for asking, Robert - by now I feel a bit reluctant in expressing these matters as they could be useless to you all. And still ... Happy

Peter

 10 
 on: July 16, 2018, 07:47:10 am 
Started by AlainGr - Last post by PeterSt
Robert,

Right after a boot, the OS has performed many tasks (or is even still perfroming them) which all leaves dirty memory behind. If you then "garbage collect" this in one go, the system (XXHighEnd) detects that it is still "working on it" and thus gives you the message.

This is perfectly normal (read : not detrimental to SQ) if it happens only once after the boot and if you reject the message and press Play again.

Best regards,
Peter

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 10 queries.